Talk:Controversy over the use of Manchester Cathedral in Resistance: Fall of Man/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Lead section summarizes the article, but could ideally do with being expanded.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Additional images might be beneficial, although I can't think of any that the article obviously needs.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Additional images might be beneficial, although I can't think of any that the article obviously needs.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Outcome: pass.

Some additional suggestions/comments: Mike Peel (talk) 11:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The template at the bottom doesn't link to this article; should it?
 * Consider adding Resistance series, and putting a link to this article on that template.
 * Consider writing referenced summaries of this article for the Manchester Cathedral and Resistance: Fall of Man articles, which currently just linking to this page.