Talk:Convair

First paragraph tagged as confusing
I can't follow the lineage after Convair became a division of General Dynamics (GD). The opening paragraph refers to the Convair division as a single entity, then presents three different dispositions, 1) sold to McDonnell Douglas, 2) a facility sold to Lockheed, and 3) shut down by GD. If it was sold off by GD, how could GD shut it down two years later??? 22:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

The Box for Convair and General Dynamics aircraft
The Box for Convair and General Dynamics aircraft needs to have added to it a line for purely experimental aircraft, because that is what American aircraft with desigations that start with "X" are: such as the X-1, X-2, X-5, X-6, X-11, X-15, X-20, XB-70, and so forth. Convair also made experimental aircraft that just had "code names" and no alphanumerical designation. Those could be placed in this line, too.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Convair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081112045623/http://www.centennialofflight.gov:80/essay/Aerospace/generaldynamics/Aero35.htm to http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Aerospace/generaldynamics/Aero35.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606012521/https://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Aerospace/Consolidated_Vultee/Aero33.htm to http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Aerospace/Consolidated_Vultee/Aero33.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081112045623/http://www.centennialofflight.gov:80/essay/Aerospace/generaldynamics/Aero35.htm to http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Aerospace/generaldynamics/Aero35.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)