Talk:Cool Hand Luke/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jionpedia (talk · contribs) 18:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Will review it in the next coming days. Regards, Jionpedia ✉  18:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Comment I've trimmed the plot to slightly over 700 words to meet the guidelines, it was previously 876 words which was too long. I'll try to make some further additions to the article today.♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:36, 20 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Whoa! I was gonna say about the plot issue, but you solved it! And when you finish the expansion, just notify me, I'll pass it. Thanks, Jionpedia ✉  13:06, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm happy with it now, I've checked over about 15 pages of google books too. Feel free to review it now. ♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:10, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I've corrected the minor errors. Looks ready for GA now.

Final analysis
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Congrats to both the original nominator of the article and Blofeld. Don't get it delisted! Thanks, --Jionpedia ✉  15:56, 20 October 2013 (UTC)