Talk:Copper(II) fluoride

has not yet been discovered in a pure form?
This sentence does not make any sense to me "It can not be prepared through reduction reactions because it has not yet been discovered in a pure form" (under the Chemistry section)

Also, the Solubility section should not contain the sentence "It also contains 62.58% copper" which is both irrelevant and trivial. I will remove it if no one has any objections

Lastly, under Hazards "If working with acids then the possibility of HCl forming may occur. A person should be cautious when dealing with HCl because it is highly toxic and corrosive" is extremely irrelevant, this is a page about CuF2 not HCl and working with acids... I will also remove this if no one has any objections.

93.172.158.89 (talk) 13:32, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm sure they meant HF, which IS extremely hazardous and could potentially result from mixing copper fluoride with acid. However, it's very concerning that someone with that little understanding of chemistry is editing this page Science Is My Life (talk) 21:36, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Copper(II) fluoride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080302034606/http://www.npi.gov.au:80/database/substance-info/profiles/27.html to http://www.npi.gov.au/database/substance-info/profiles/27.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060116134617/http://www.npi.gov.au/database/substance-info/profiles/44.html to http://www.npi.gov.au/database/substance-info/profiles/44.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Solubility in other solvents
"Hygroscopic" is irrelevant to the discussion of solubility in other solvents and just doesn't make any sense here. I'd remove it, but idk how to do that without messing up the data table. Science Is My Life (talk) 21:37, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Nevermind. I figured it out. But someone should probably go back and find an actual answer to the question of what it's solubility profile is Science Is My Life (talk) 21:40, 21 June 2022 (UTC)