Talk:Copycat (Marvel Comics)

Untitled
Despite 24.163.87.180's rephrasing of sentences since the initial exact duplicate from I feel this still poses a copyright violation. Oh, and adding a sentence that this website had "not been looked at under any circumstances" seems a blatant lie, since it is clear the initial version of this article was an exact duplicate of that web page. UkPaolo 14:04, 6 October 2005 (UTC)


 * You know what? I was not the first to post on that site. I saw that someone had been accused of copyright infrigement, so I decided to take things into my own hands. Everything I wrote is mine. They are MY words and for anyone to think differently is proposterous. Please, do not label this article as infringing on copyrights. They are my words. I AM the author. Do not let this continue to happen. Have you read the two separate articles? If you have, then you would have noticed the differences and then understood that those are MY words! Copycat is a favourite character of mine, so I want to see her profile back on Wikipedia as soon as possible. I am faith that you people will finally read the two articles to determine that they are NOT the same. Thank you...
 * above unsigned comment by User:Demitri7


 * I suggest you compare and : you will see that they are both identical. I of course read your message regarding copyright (which was innappropriately placed, and belonged on this talk page) but as I said above, I feel this still poses a copyright problem since the article in it's current form is basically just a slightly rephrased variant of that original copied text. I'm sorry if you disagree, but now this page is listed at Copyright problems then some administrators will take a look, and make a decision. In the meantime, if you wish to see an article on Copycat on Wikipedia, I suggest you leave the CopyVio notice on this page intact, and follow it's guidance in creating a new, entirely original, article at a new temp page. This can ultimately replace the CopyVio, or have it's content merged if this article is later found not to be a copyright violation. Regards, UkPaolo 06:44, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

wouldnt rob liefeld be credited as her creator?

Copycat is incorrectly named Vanessa Carslyle in Cable #37-38 69.138.81.129 20:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

"Deadpool's feelings towards Siryn grew, so she left him after having taken his appearance to attack her, in hopes of souring their potential relationship."

The use of pronouns leaves a bit of confusion. Did Siryn attack Copycat while adopting Deadpool's appearance? Or did Copycat attack Siryn under the guise of Deadpool? A little clarification would make it much easier for a neophyte unfamiliar with this character (such as myself) to understand what's going on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.119.35.246 (talk) 21:29, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Copycat (Marvel Comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140625173519/http://uncannyxmen.net/characters/copycat to http://uncannyxmen.net/characters/copycat

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 00:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)