Talk:Coravin

Paid editing tag
In January I blocked an editor who was clearly here only to spam for this article. I also have no doubt that it was created by an editor who was clearly here only to plant this article. The article was nominated for deletion by who withdrew the nomination after solid sleuthing by. Personally, I think the article is still on the thin side of notability, but that's beside the point. The point of this note is really to say that given the efforts of three experienced editors (five, really, counting and ) the article is in decent shape, and I think it is safe to remove the disfiguring tag. Really, the tag serves as a warning that the content might not be neutral--which sort of denies the work done by these five editors. I am leaving this note here then to serve as a notification that such a problem did indeed exist in the past, but the article in its current shape is unproblematic enough to not be tagged like this. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 15:27, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree with the removal of the UDP tag. As stated above, I made a major cut to the article before, and since then the article has been gradually built back up under the watchful eye of several established editors. It is clear from the number of SPA's that have edited this article that some off-wiki entity is attempting to make content changes, but as these changes have been consistently trimmed down I have no objection to removing the UDP tag. We should keep an eye on the article, however.--SamHolt6 (talk) 15:54, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I've gone ahead and removed the tag myself.--SamHolt6 (talk) 16:35, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Shoot SamHolt6, I meant to do that but forgot--thanks! Ah the glories of collaborative editing. Drmies (talk) 17:06, 17 May 2018 (UTC)