Talk:Core model

Two sections with the same title
There are two sections titled Construction of core models. Could they not be merged? 86.145.59.83 (talk) 10:25, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Erroneous reference
The reference
 * W.H. Woodin (2001). The Continuum Hypothesis, Part I. Notices of the AMS.

is not what it claims to be. 86.145.59.83 (talk) 10:30, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Care to elaborate? --Trovatore (talk) 07:53, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The paper is titled 'Recent Advances in Core Model Theory'.31.52.252.154 (talk) 12:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Here is a link to the paper directly. The title seems correct. . The link in the references was not right, so I updated it. Anyone could have done that.  &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 12:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Core model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110617031749/http://www.math.ufl.edu/~wjm/papers/ to http://www.math.ufl.edu/~wjm/papers/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 11:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Citation would be nice
Where does this conjecture appear? - "It is conjectured that if K exists and V is closed under a sharp operator M, then K is Σ11 correct allowing real numbers in K as parameters and M as a predicate. That amounts to Σ13 correctness (in the usual sense) if M is x→x#."