Talk:Coremark

huh?
"void the well understood issues that have been cited with Dhrystone" - what issues? Kotz (talk) 15:25, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Major problems with this article
It's written from a very obvious pro-Coremark and anti-Dhrystone slant. Many statements of opinion are made, and there are no citations, only references at the bottom. Jaysbro (talk) 19:13, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coremark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004215215/http://www.elektroniknet.de/home/news/n/d/coremark-open-source-benchmark-von-eembc/ to http://www.elektroniknet.de/home/news/n/d/coremark-open-source-benchmark-von-eembc/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)