Talk:Corina Crețu

Colin Powell
Why is there no reference to her relationship with former General Colin Powell?--Bing Norton 11:49, 5 August 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BingNorton (talk • contribs)
 * Probably because like every single media report on it explains, there is no confirmation, or public information. And the only reports that get into the content of the emails, it becomes obvious that there was no affair, she was trying to seduce him and failed. In fact the detailed references to past conversations in the emails make it clear nothing had happened; the most intimate encounter referenced is him telling her a joke! http://nypost.com/2013/08/03/inside-colin-powells-hot-and-heavy-e-mails/ 76.105.216.34 (talk) 17:51, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

New section "Criticism against her designation as European Commissioner" marked as NPOV by Onel5969
User Onel5969 has marked the new section as NPOV promptly. First of all we'd like to express our appreciation for Onel5969's highly recognized experience. However he intervened without giving details or explanations about his motive, which seems a bit bold. We disagree and he possibly didn't read the new section well: It does NOT, at any time, pretend that Mrs. Cretu was involved in the affair with the secret CIA-torture-facilities! What the article does, is citing an EUROPEAN citizens petition lodged on the 14.10.2014, stating that she was possibly aware and involved in this affair and that this aspect must be cleared, before appointing her Commissioner. In order to be transparent and fair regarding precisely this distinction, the section cites the Dick Marty Report II, with: “Only the highest state authorities were aware of the CIA’s illegal activities on their territories.” Well: “The highest state authorities“ as a matter of fact comprises precisely the “Presidential Adviser (with the rank of Minister), Presidential Spokesperson and Head of the Public Communication Department“. This apreciation still doesn't prove that she was personally aware and involved in the affair, but it is a strong refernce, that she possibly was. We thank Onel5969 in advance to express his point of view swiftly, since otherwise his intervention, marking the new section NPOV, would result in withholding relevant information from the public. Sincerely, Lynx1812. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lynx1812 (talk • contribs) 14:49, 16 October 2014 (UTC)