Talk:Corinna/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 07:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'll be reviewing this, I should be posting comments tomorrow! Kingsif (talk) 07:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Style

 * Lead good length for article
 * Very well written in a considered voice - neutral but interesting
 * Informative in a tone appropriate for subject
 * Good progression of information through paragraphs and sections
 * Not much to say as it is consistently well-written:
 * there are no visible issues with grammar
 * language is good and voice is strong
 * reads well throughout
 * Very well done
 * Pass

Coverage

 * Lead good length, comprehensive on the main issues regarding the subject which also double as a summary of her biography
 * Concise with good depth on the subject and her works; additional information included contextualizes the subject and is only to the article's benefit
 * Would perhaps question if there's more comparison with Sappho/other Greek female poets? There's the Smyth note in the lead and the Skinner note on women's poetry, but if her work is of interest because she is one of few female poets with preserved work, is there not more on the comparisons?
 * Looking through the edit history, more on this was added shortly before nom; with such good research in the article I am assuming if there was more available on comparisons it would have been added then.
 * Pass

Illustration

 * Multiple good quality images.
 * Satisfactory for article length
 * Pass

Neutrality

 * weighs opinions of the bio well
 * and views of the poetry and others' opinions also neutral
 * Pass

Stability

 * No major changes since nom
 * Other big changes in October '18 or earlier
 * Pass

Verifiability

 * Many high quality sources.
 * Pass

Copyright

 * Looks clean
 * Pass

Overall

 * Symbol support vote.svg Exceptionally good article. Kingsif (talk) 18:05, 12 September 2019 (UTC)