Talk:Coromandel International

Reliable and unreliable sources
Currently (October 19, 2009), this article has 23 sources used as references, most of which don't pass the WP:RS policy. Here's how I see them: Without solid sourcing, there isn't an article. Right now, this article has little to no sourcing. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 01:01, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) sify.com - appears to pull from a database; not a published article
 * 2) google.com - another database
 * 3) icarda.org - press release
 * 4) thehindu.com - usually a reliable source, but this appears to be a reprint of a press release
 * 5) businesstoday.intoday.in - site is currently down, so I can't tell
 * 6) enet.cflindia.com - subject's own web site
 * 7) cii.in - marketing piece from the Confederation of Indian Industry
 * 8) cii-iq.in - another marketing piece from the Confederation of Indian Industry
 * 9) murugappa.com - web site of subject's corporate parent
 * 10) vizagbuzz.com - this site's own about page (seen here) says they aren't reliable
 * 11) thehindubusinessline.com - appears to be a press release
 * 12) ias.ac.in - looks like a solid source, but it doesn't actually say much about the subject
 * 13) ohio4h.org - press release
 * 14) cseindia.org - promotional; doesn't actually say much about the subject
 * 15) financialexpress.com - press release that isn't actually about the subject
 * 16) financialexpress.com - another press release that isn't actually about the subject
 * 17) thehindubusinessline.com - appears to be a press release
 * 18) thehindubusinessline.com - appears to be a press release
 * 19) thehindubusinessline.com - appears to be a press release
 * 20) online.wsj.com - this is an actual article, but subject isn't mentioned until five paragraphs from the end
 * 21) indiaprwire.com - press release
 * 22) fao.org - database lookup that says nothing about the company
 * 23) fao.org - database lookup that says nothing about the company