Talk:Corona Borealis/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: The Herald (talk · contribs) 14:32, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

As requested, the review will be completed in a day or two and I declare my participation in WikiCup. Ṫ Ḧ the joy of the LORD my strength 14:32, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Criteria
 Good Article Status – Review Criteria   		A good article is—  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ; and
 * (c).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

</ol>

Review

 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comments and discussion

 * Talking about cites, all looks good and well reliable with a few doubt which I have. Makemson 1941 and Squire, C. (2000) do not point anywhere and will be good with online cites, if possible. Some refs need access-date and some needs a trim. Ṫ Ḧ <sup style="margin-left:0.5px">the joy of the LORD <sub style="margin-left:-47.5px">my strength 15:16, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * all the all cite webs have accessdates, others do not need them. Squire and Makemson should click down to the book refs now. I don't understand that web check link - if I click on them, they work.... Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The lead section uses a good amount of pronouns which could be replaces by nouns or better replacements. Ṫ Ḧ <sup style="margin-left:0.5px">the joy of the LORD <sub style="margin-left:-47.5px">my strength 15:16, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I have changed one pronoun to "Corona Borealis" - I worry if I change another it will sound too repetitive Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Modern references section requires a slight expansion. Ṫ Ḧ <sup style="margin-left:0.5px">the joy of the LORD <sub style="margin-left:-47.5px">my strength 15:16, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I can't find any other modern references but expanded the story a little Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)


 * More footnotes/cites are expected in infobox. Ṫ Ḧ <sup style="margin-left:0.5px">the joy of the LORD <sub style="margin-left:-47.5px">my strength 12:21, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * the infobox is proving difficult to insert references in...I will see which ones are ok. Actually none of the Featured Article constellations have more footnotes in the infobox. I guess we can look at it as a Lead, with the references in the body of the text. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)


 * It was one of the 48 constellation mentioned in Almagest by Claudius Ptolemy. This could be explained in the history section. Ṫ Ḧ <sup style="margin-left:0.5px">the joy of the LORD <sub style="margin-left:-47.5px">my strength 13:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * good catch - added to body of text now Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:41, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Result
The article passed the GA review and is left with two redlinks, owing to their significance as future articles. The article is now satisfying the criteria for the GA-status and made it go. Ṫ Ḧ <sup style="margin-left:0.5px">the joy of the LORD <sub style="margin-left:-47.5px">my strength 07:03, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * thx +++ Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:46, 8 March 2015 (UTC)