Talk:Coronado Island Film Festival

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because (A) it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of it. Examples: San Diego Union Tribune, IndieWire, CBS8, The Wrap. The more I google the more I find.

It is a neutral page about a major film festival. There are hundreds of wikipedia pages about similar and less significant film festivals and allowed on Wikipedia.

It is not self promotion. I live in San Diego and I like film festivals but I don't work for them, and I've never even been to one of their programs.

I see that I did not post the independent links on the page, but they're there (linked above) and I will be working on posting them on the page. In the meantime, I've got a busy day ahead of me. Pardon me if I don't post every single one right away.

--Kire1975 (talk) 16:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Contested General notability flag
There are eight reliable articles from seven independent sources (IndieWire, TheWrap, sandiegouniontribune, CaroLine, Surf's Up Studios, Coronado Times and CBS8 SanDiego) already cited in this wiki page. User:Elahrairah already said it looks notable when he or she declined the speedy deletion flag. It's a big film festival with big stars that gets notable coverage in many different sources. I'll admit that I'm still learning, but with all due respect, User:Onel5969, what's the problem exactly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kire1975 (talk • contribs) 07:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The Chris Lemmon lung transplant story was printed in at least two reliable major newspapers (San Diego Union Tribune and Allentown Morning Call). I won't remove the general notability flag myself until consensus is reached. Kire1975 (talk) 17:07, 18 August 2019 (UTC)


 * It seems notable to me. Since no one has disagreed for over a year, I'm deleting the tag---- Work permit (talk) 17:58, 18 August 2019 (UTC)