Talk:Coronation of William IV and Adelaide

Requested move 19 May 2019

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed, without opposition. bd2412 T 02:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

– Per WP:CONSISTENCY and WP:CONCISE. When I started a discussion for moving Coronation of Elizabeth I and Coronation of Elizabeth II to Coronation of Queen Elizabeth I and Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II respectively, everyone brought up WP:CONCISE and emphasized on the fact that the titles need to be as short as possible. Also, it was mentioned that these articles should be consistent with the main articles about these monarchs (George VI, not King George VI, etc.) I don't see a reason for applying these set of rules only to the articles about the coronation of female monarchs. Based on the arguments brought up by the users, these pages need to be moved as well. I also thought it might be better to refer to the consorts with their first names, rather than their maiden names, because that might be confusing for some readers in this case. Keivan.f Talk 21:39, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Coronation of King William IV and Queen Adelaide → Coronation of William IV and Adelaide
 * Coronation of King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra → Coronation of Edward VII and Alexandra
 * Coronation of King George V and Queen Mary → Coronation of George V and Mary
 * Coronation of King George VI and Queen Elizabeth → Coronation of George VI and Elizabeth
 * Support. Srnec (talk) 21:30, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Is mention of the consort necessary in the title? Couldn't it simply be 'Coronation of George VI'? The article can outline the coronation of the consort but the primary subject of the article is always the monarch's coronation. --DilatoryRevolution (talk) 03:23, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If two people are crowned in the same ceremony and the article discusses both, I think it is only reasonable to mention both in the title. Surtsicna (talk) 10:49, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.