Talk:Corporate Crush/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Good article nomination on hold
This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of September 5, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Per WP:LEAD, the lede/intro should be an adequate summary of all subsections of the article, not just some brief airdate/guest star/plot info. Some long sentences in the Plot subsection, needs copyediting.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Yes, duly cited to WP:RS/WP:V sources. However, please add cites after each sentence where there are direct quotes in the Reception section - not just at the end of a paragraph or selected review.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Production section of the article could be expanded upon a bit more.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Appears to be written in a neutrally-worded manner. Passes here.
 * 5. Article stability? No issues upon inspection of edit history or talk page. Passes here.
 * 6. Images?: One image used, fair-use rationale is provided on the image page. Passes here.

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. Cirt (talk) 09:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately not all above issues were addressed. The plot section is a little bit better but could still use some copyediting work. The production section appears to still be mainly just a list of cast from the episode that also did work on Saturday Night Live, not real info about the production of the episode itself. If this info is improved please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page, and I will give it another look and do another review faster than the normal WP:GAN process - but at this time I am not listing this article as GA. Cirt (talk) 04:20, 16 September 2008 (UTC)