Talk:Corporate design

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 January 2021 and 19 March 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Thaonguyen050300. Peer reviewers: LycheeJelly1, Kiyana929.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled
This wording should be cleaned up:

The flag of Germany is one example of a corporate design created by the nation of Germany because of the German federal cabinet introduced a corporate design for the German government on 2 June 1999.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Corporate design. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080915085300/http://styleguide.bundesregierung.de/Webs/SG/DE/Print-Styleguide/Basiselemente/Farben/Primaerfarben/primaerfarben.html to http://styleguide.bundesregierung.de/Webs/SG/DE/Print-Styleguide/Basiselemente/Farben/Primaerfarben/primaerfarben.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:44, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Redirect to Brand
I’m redirecting this to Brand. I have reviewed all paragraphs here, and one or more of the following concerns applies to each: In case there was a retention-worthy version of this article that could be restored, I have reviewed a dozen previous versions of this article from points spanning the decade and a half the article has existed. The strongest version I found was.
 * 1) the content reads like an essay
 * 2) the content reads like a how-to
 * 3) the content is unsourced
 * 4) better coverage already exists at either Brand or Corporate identity

I have not accessed hard copies of non-web-based references, but the nature of their titles in combination with the types of statements they supporting makes me confident that the citations need not be retained.

Corporate identity also has tone issues, so Brand seems like the best possible redirect target.

—jameslucas ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  12:52, 14 February 2021 (UTC)