Talk:Corporate identity/Archives/2014

We should review the current links
I just added a link to the Open Directory category Corporate Identity. There are a lot of good links there, including some that we have here. My suggestion is that we review the links here and remove all but one or two that are extremely valuable to our readers who want to understand corporate identity. Since the Open Directory has all sorts of links to services, information, and the like, that removes the need for Wikipedia to provide more links than strictly necessary.

If no discussion starts up in the next while, I go ahead and do it using my own judgement. Of course, if someone disagrees with my choices then we can come here and have that discussion. &mdash; Saxifrage ✎ 18:54, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I removed two online magazines and a site with plain descriptions of logos (without commentary) and a list of resources. I kept a link to a page full of commentary on the handling of brand and identity changes by companies, and a page full of resources on corporate identity and editorial content about corporate identity. I think these two links with the DMOZ link make for a brief but maximally-useful external links section which follows the letter and spirit of External links. &mdash; Saxifrage ✎ 02:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Here is my proposal for link http://brandbooks.info with big collection of the corporate identity and visual guidelines from the bests. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.29.56.242 (talk) 16:00, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Reference
This article needs more in-line citations. Jingqinxin (talk) 17:43, 10 September 2014 (UTC)