Talk:Corpus Christi Bay/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Us441 (talk) 19:43, 4 August 2010 (UTC) This looks like it could pass, even though not many Start-Class articles skip to GA.Us441 (talk) 19:43, 4 August 2010 (UTC)


 * The Start-Class assessment was given before the article was rewritten. I had to rewrite the entire article a few months ago because the whole thing was a copyright violation.--William S. Saturn (talk) 03:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Here is my final review:
 * 1) .Well-written, MoS
 * 2) .References, Reliable Sources , Original Research
 * 3) .Major aspects Focused
 * 4) .Neutral
 * 5) .Stable
 * 6) .Copyright Captions


 * When I was reviewing, I fixed it up, performing 23 edits (my first as IP; I forgot to log in), and now the only shortcoming is primary sources. I will put this article on hold shortly. Us441 (talk) 15:40, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Now it is on hold. Us441 (talk) 15:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)


 * What primary sources are you referring to?--William S. Saturn (talk) 16:02, 9 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Newspapers. Us441 (talk) 16:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Newspapers are generally considered reliable because the report is usually secondary to the event, and the reporter is usually not a participant in the event.--William S. Saturn (talk) 16:29, 9 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Is this review complete? --William S. Saturn (talk) 20:39, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Sorry I took so long to say I was changing the minus into a plus; I had other things to do outside of Wikipedia. I am going to pass this article. Us441 (talk) 21:06, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review.--William S. Saturn (talk) 21:22, 9 August 2010 (UTC)