Talk:Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum

Link to German Version
There exists a German version of this article which should be integrated/linked:

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_Vasorum_Antiquorum

Capital letters
Each word of "Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum begins with a capital letter. The main page should therefore be spelt "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_Vasorum_Antiquorum"; anyone entering "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_vasorum_antiquorum" should be redirected to the former, not vice versa, as is the case at the moment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.232.135.91 (talk) 13:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Corpus vasorum antiquorum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080820232030/http://www.uai-iua.org/francais/entreprises/entr_1_fr.asp to http://www.uai-iua.org/francais/entreprises/entr_1_fr.asp
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090721055927/http://www.oeaw.ac.at/antike/corpora/cva/corpvas.html to http://www.oeaw.ac.at/antike/corpora/cva/corpvas.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Mandate on the CVA
The mandate of the CVA as described here is pretty confusing, and the confusion carries over to other articles. The term "classical" is thrown around without much consistency. We read that it includes the 7th millenium BC. Then we have a reference to the classical Greek period. Exactly what is the CVA doing, and which CVA? Where does the CVA online fit in? Definitions need some clarification, which I will try to do.Botteville (talk) 06:52, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Well I have adjusted a bit, but the CVA website is itself rather vague. Clearly the 7th millenium BC is not classical in any sense. I imagine the printed volumes, & maybe the online ones, contain some prehistoric material from the early days of wider ambitions. Johnbod (talk) 10:21, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi John, nice to hear from you. I'm finally getting around to doing something with the pottery.Botteville (talk) 14:13, 5 December 2018 (UTC)