Talk:Corrida de Cori/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 22:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments Lots of jargon makes this practically inaccessible to non-experts, and a few other formatting issues. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 10:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * "5 kilometres (3.1 mi) elevation" either "in elevation" or "above an elevation of 5 "
 * "The range together with several local volcanoes " -> "The range, together with several local volcanoes, "
 * "the Plio-Pleistocene" vs " of Pliocene-Pleistocene" forgive my ignorance, but is this the same? The linking is different...
 * Argentina–Chile border has an article, and it uses an en-dash too.
 * "lava flows" link?
 * Link lineament.
 * "and ENE lineaments" what's ENE?
 * "magma ascent" link?
 * There isn't a link for this, but I've explained in the article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * "primitive basaltic lavas" link?
 * I can't find an usable definition of the term, so I've cut it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * "Imilac-Salina" en-dash.
 * "15-20 mya" en-dash and link mya.
 * "1-2 " en-dash.
 * "basaltic andesites and dacitic ignimbrites and ended in the late Quaternary with basaltic andesites in form of cinder cones" link all these jargon terms.
 * "aeolian activity" link.
 * "hydrothermal alteration" link.
 * "These Escorial lava flows are" repetitive.
 * A lot of those terms I mention above appear to be linked, just not first time.
 * "fumarole spires" link.
 * "crustal origin" link.
 * Rewrote this one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * "fumarolic alteration" link.
 * Recast this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * "at an altitude" elevation.
 * "about 1,392 millimetres" "about" and then given to the nearest mm??
 * Cut the "about", it's based on a weather station there. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * "1976-1977" en-dash.
 * "reported in 1976-1977" ditto.
 * "p.190" it's normal to have a space between p. and the number.
 * You sure? I don't think I see such a space frequently. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I see a space everywhere. The citation templates put a space in after the p. or pp.  It's absolutely the case.  The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 17:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Added it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * "pp.181-182" -> pp. 181–182
 * "1976-1977" in ref 1 should use en-dash.
 * Replied and processed everything else. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)