Talk:Cosmos (operating system)

Should this still be a stub
When this page was marked as a stub it had one paragraph that gave some brief information, and a couple of link. After some work it now has three paragraphs which are somewhat more detailed, an OS template box, numerous external links and is somewhat more readable. I feel that this no longer fits the outline for a stub, and many other pages not marked as stubs are quite similar to this. What does everyone else think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atomtech (talk • contribs) 16:08, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Examples?
I think there should be exaples of the many different Cosmos Operating systems 152.26.29.100 (talk) 18:07, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Update in progress
I'm currently updating this page to represent the newest changes to Cosmos, and just cleaning it up in general. The information described here is woefully out of date. Please note that the first few sections have been completed, while a few sections from the older version are still there.

Joshbeitler (talk) 17:28, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Microsoft?
Is Cosmos still being developed, and isn't it written by Microsoft? can we have a line in the article that talks about that? Bumblebritches57 (talk) 12:36, 27 September 2013 (UTC)