Talk:Cosoryx

Requested move 14 December 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved  (t &#183; c)  buidhe  14:19, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Cosoryx → Cosoryx furcatus – Perhaps this comes from a place of ignorance, but I believe the title should be Cosoryx furcatus instead of just Cosoryx, since the article refers to a specific species and not the genus as a whole. Slippery Shaman (talk) 18:39, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * support teh article is about the species not the genus. blindlynx (talk) 19:47, 14 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Oppose - monotypic genera are always covered at the genus level (unless there is another article with the same name). See: FunkMonk (talk) 19:50, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose per FunkMonk. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)