Talk:Costa Coffee/Archives/2012

Concessions in Abbey branches
Have they not pulled out of this? I've not seen an Abbey with a Costa for ages. Dmccormac 19:52, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

WP:FOOD Tagging
This article talk page was automatically added with WikiProject Food and drink banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot (talk) 08:58, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism
Westernpit reverted an edit of mine of a while back as vandalism. It wasn't; my edit was itself to revert vandalism by Coffeeaffection, a banned sockpuppet (see ). I think Westernpit is confused. Fences and windows (talk) 04:12, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Master Roasters Claim
I can find no independent citation for the Italian Master Roaster claim in the article. It is mentioned in Costa publicity but not in independent sources. This should be removed as it makes the article into a publicity piece for Costa. --Rubken (talk) 17:49, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You make a good point: it would appear to be an American term used by the Roasters Guild and I've not seen any UK references to support the claim. I'd be tempted to leave it with the tag for a few weeks to see if anyone can substantiate it. Warren (talk) 14:07, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

See also: starbucks/cafe nero?
What relevance do these have to costa coffee? The only similarity is that theyre coffee shops, but I dont think thats any reason to list them under see also, is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.195.230.149 (talk) 15:45, 1 September 2009 (UTC) As Costa and Starbucks are both coffee shops, I think they should be listed under the same industry. Starbucks is currently under Restaurants and Costa under Hospitality. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.174.206.136 (talk) 22:01, 30 September 2012 (UTC)