Talk:Coumachlor

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Coumachlor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120119193658/http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/ProductDetail.do?D7=0&N5=SEARCH_CONCAT_PNO to http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/ProductDetail.do?D7=0&N5=SEARCH_CONCAT_PNO

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:55, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coumachlor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426041946/http://www.clearsynth.com/docs/MSD-CS-T-05321.pdf to http://www.clearsynth.com/docs/MSD-CS-T-05321.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Removing insanely incorrect statement
I am removing a sentence from this stub article "Although the compound is non-hazardous but toxicological properties have not been researched yet.[3]" as this is not only bad grammar but blatantly daft. This chemical was used as a rodenticide, its toxicity to mammals is listed in the original quoted reference as 'high' (as you'd expect for a chemical designed to kill mammals), and it has a whole string of unpleasant consequences for anyone who consumes it. It's quite scary and irresponsible that Wikipedia is going round describing things like this as 'non-hazardous'. It's quite common for chemical data-sheets to have a lot of not-yet-investigated properties, but that's no excuse for assuming lack of hazard. I have no reason to believe that this compound is any more harmful than other rat poisons, but it's definitely not non-hazardous. 149.155.219.44 (talk) 09:52, 19 November 2018 (UTC)