Talk:Counterfactual quantum computation

Reference for the first definition
The first definition is referenced with reference 1, which is correct regarding the content of the definition but the wording used first appears in reference 6. Therefore, it is not the "original formulation".

Should the reference be changed, the phrasing "original formulation" altered or the real first formulation be used instead? The wording used here is a more general one and is, in my opinion, easier to understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NablaImperator (talk • contribs) 18:12, 8 September 2020 (UTC)