Talk:County Route 97 (Rockland County, New York)

Merger Proposal
I believe this article should be merged, adding elements of the "History" section into the target article. Andy 1One (talk) 01:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * There is far too much topic-specific content to merge into the "list" article. --Oakshade (talk) 04:59, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Far too much? The route description is basically the same as the lead, and the history can easily be merged. Look at the other routes on the main list? There are entries longer than Route 97! The AfD said keep, so I say MERGE NOW! (making a point, not yelling:) )--GroundhogTheater (talk) 07:57, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose merger. --Rschen7754 (T C) 09:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * As do I. Groundhog, you even said yourself in the AfD that this article has been around for quite a while, so why must it be merged or deleted now? –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  14:39, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge- The information has been either on the page or the list for months. So I was saying Andy's AfD was not premature. Don't twist my words, I don't twist yours. Not asking you to agree with me, but respect my stance. Thanks! --GroundhogTheater (talk) 20:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Definite Merge - Most of article is repeat information found on the proposed merge landing spot page. Junction list is useless and as Groundhog points out, route description info resembles information in top section. Author claimed to have extra history, well now would be the time to post that.-- Burp The Baby   (Talk)  23:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Repeat comment - Again, lets give Mitchazenia time to build the page. The AfD failed because the closing admin granted time to Mitch to get it done. So there should be no rush to merge! --Airtuna08 (talk) 08:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)