Talk:Courageous-class aircraft carrier/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:36, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comments Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:03, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Problems with the introduction. It is supposed to be a summary of the article. And the main article tag is for a summary of another article. Could you move it and other information about their careers as battlecruisers into a short first section with the main tag (this article's fine introduction could be lifted for the purpose) and redo the introduction as a summary of the article. It would be nice if it could also mention some of the "firsts" achieved by these notable ships.
 * 2) *How does it work now? Anything else you think should be covered?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) The second paragraph in the Conversions section is way longer than any of the other paragraphs in the article. Could it be broken up?
 * 4) *Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) There is no ALT text on the images. (I'll pass it without them but hey)
 * 1) *Thanks for correcting my American spellings; I'm pretty good at adding the extra u, but usually forget about the s/z/c thing.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)