Talk:Courageous (song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 02:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Infobox

 * No information in article to support genre of song as "Christian rock"
 * Done.  Toa   Nidhiki05  15:23, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Lead

 * Include some information about the song from the "Background and recording" section and put it in the first paragraph of the lead
 * Done.  Toa   Nidhiki05  15:23, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Background and recording

 * No issues

Composition

 * No issues

Critical reception

 * Tom Lennie of Cross Rhythms was less positive, calling the song was "one of the least melodic tunes... → Replace "was" with "as"
 * Corrected the mistake.  Toa   Nidhiki05  15:23, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * ...and said the bridge made the song "thought-provoking".[6] → Wiki-link "the bridge" as some readers may not know what this refers to
 * Done.  Toa   Nidhiki05  15:23, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Release and chart performance

 * No issues

Credits and personnel

 * No issues

Chart positions

 * Put information into subsections to organize the section better
 * Done?  Toa   Nidhiki05  15:23, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Release and radio history

 * No issues