Talk:Coyote Calhoun

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Coyote J. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140606231320/http://www.bwcitypaper.com/Articles-i-2008-09-04-223707.113122-Hang-the-DJ.html to http://www.bwcitypaper.com/Articles-i-2008-09-04-223707.113122-Hang-the-DJ.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111102141535/http://www.bwcitypaper.com:80/Articles-i-2008-09-04-223707.113122_Hang_the_DJ.html to http://www.bwcitypaper.com/Articles-i-2008-09-04-223707.113122_Hang_the_DJ.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120725000010/http://www.bwcitypaper.com/Articles-i-2011-02-17-240081.113121-The-Golden-Age-of-Birmingham-Broadcasting.html to http://www.bwcitypaper.com/Articles-i-2011-02-17-240081.113121-The-Golden-Age-of-Birmingham-Broadcasting.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:19, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Notability issues
I would agree that this article has many issues and might be refactored somehow. However I do not think notability is one of them. I think it could be shortened and more biographical information added. A youtube video that is a recording of his firing at Z102 in 1988 is actively gathering over 1100 comments for an event that happened over 30 years ago lends credence to its historicity. I certainly understand the question but in this case it likely skates inside the line.

Is there a standard for notability?? Because if this gets deleted I can think of a few more articles which are biographies of Wikipedians themselves used for self promotion (and manage to somehow miraculously stay) that should be kicked to the curb immediately.

I'm of the perception that it does not seem notable to some people because they do not or did not belong to the communities which these people circulated. Perhaps that might be used in some future metric for notability. I do not have the time resource to spend on this article at the moment which it does need, but I do think it should remain until cleaned up. Nodekeeper (talk)