Talk:Cranial nerves/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Seppi333 (talk · contribs) 23:09, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Discussion
Figured this nom has waited in the queue long enough... hehe.  Seppi  333  (Insert 2¢ &#124; Maintained) 23:12, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

After going through the entire page, I found a few clauses that I was unable to fix due to ambiguity in the prose:


 * 1) The accessory nerve (XI) is considered either a cranial nerve or a spinal nerve which emanates level with the brain-stem.[1] (Not sure what this means.)
 * ✅ - and arrises on level of the brain-stem.


 * 1) This is due to impairment in the lateral rectus muscle, which is innervated by the nerve .[1] (Which nerve?)
 * ✅ - innervated by the abducens nerve.


 * 1) This jerk is a reflex involving an induced twitch in muscles involved in closing the jaw when upon tapping on the jaw. (No clue what that last part means.)
 * ✅ - gives rise to twitch in some of the muscles involved in closing the jaw, and occurs when the jaw is tapped from a precise angle.


 * 1) The glossopharyngeal nerve (IX) is almost exclusively sensory in supplying five afferent nuclei of the brainstem, covering the oropharynx and back of the tongue with innervation.[1] (This sentence is written rather oddly. Not entirely sure what was meant.)
 * ✅ - The glossopharyngeal nerve (IX) is almost exclusively sensory and supplies five afferent nuclei of the brainstem, providing sensory innervation to the oropharynx and back of the tongue.

There were a lot of misplaced semicolons, missing commas/periods, and run-on sentences, but I think I managed to fix these problems. In any event, I'll pass the prose criteria once these 4 sentences are fixed.  Seppi  333  (Insert 2¢ &#124; Maintained) 01:04, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * -- CFCF  🍌 (email) 10:55, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * } Just in case you missed it. -- CFCF  🍌 (email) 17:07, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the late reply, been really busy over the weekend.  Seppi  333  (Insert 2¢ &#124; Maintained) 02:08, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Review
 :

:

:

.

. :



Criteria
 Good Article Status - Review Criteria   		A good article is&mdash;  <li>:</li>
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

<li>:</li>
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ; and
 * (c).

<li>:</li>
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

<li>.</li> <li>.</li> <li>:</li>
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

</ol>

Additional Notes

 * Thanks for the review, I am currently away for a few more days, but when I get home on Wednesday (20th) I will take on the comments, and I think I may be able to improve some minor things as well. 18:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)