Talk:Crash position indicator

Technology
A nice article, but I had hoped to see more technological details. Frequency & modulation? Battery-powered? Vacuum tubes? TIA for any addition! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 15.203.233.79 (talk) 13:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Tone and diction
This is indeed an interesting article, but the tone is somewhat conversational instead of encyclopedic. In particular, the use of "they" to refer to all sorts of antecedents, some of them quite unclear, detracts from the overall quality of the article. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 17:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * There are 5 instances of the word "they" in the article, and all but one immediately follow a mention of who "they" refers. Which ones do you feel are unclear? Maury Markowitz (talk) 23:32, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Crash position indicator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120404094401/http://www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/uofaengineer/article.cfm?article=34604&issue=34329 to http://www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/uofaengineer/article.cfm?article=34604&issue=34329

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)