Talk:Crassispira incrassata/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 20 upper (talk · contribs) 12:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Comments
Before the end of the day, I believe I can complete this review. 20 upper (talk) 12:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

You seem to be done, please be patient while I look through the references. This could take some time. 20 upper (talk) 17:56, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * , citation issue resolved. 🏵️ Etrius ( Us) 04:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I've finished my review. 20 upper (talk) 09:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * , Done. 🏵️ Etrius ( Us) 18:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The first sentence confuses the reader, I suggest removing a marine gastropod mollusk


 * Fix the intertidal zones link




 * Rephrase this, I don't think this snail "served" anything.


 * Drop "located"


 * Remove – You don't need to include this.


 * Seems like WP:SYNTH
 * ✅, cut sentences and reworded


 * varies => ranges


 * Why not cite citation 10 once, at the end of the paragraph?


 * Rephrase, is the proboscis half the length of the rhychodeum? The flow is very off.


 * Relative in what? In size? Specify.


 * Grammatical error detected; it is medium-sized not medium-size


 * Distribution and habitat seems way too short to be a subheading
 * ❌, I agree that it's short, but MOS doesn't explicitly forbid short subsections. Many GAs have short subsections like this.
 * Example? 20 upper (talk) 17:58, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Boquila, Anomochilus weberi, and Little blue heron all have 1 to 2 sentence sections/subsections in them. MOS only says to try to avoid them, species articles are often exceptions to this because most species, by definition, meet WP:NOTE but many lack broad coverage. 🏵️ Etrius ( Us) 18:14, 4 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Any references on its diet, reproduction or behavior?
 * I wish!!! This was all I could find!!


 * Add the undefined undefined template for 180 μm
 * The convert template doesn't go that low. I added a manual conversion, even though it's very small.


 * This marine species => It
 * ✅, replaced with 'C. incrassata'


 * Citation 3 should be fixed.


 * In the lead, change endemic through to endemic to


 * unlink species, sea snail, family in Taxonomy,


 * unlink sexually in Description


 * Unlink common country names like Mexico and Ecuador


 * No caption for lead image


 * Citation 1 doesn't support
 * ✅, added a source


 * Earwig detected no copyvio
 * Citations are reliable

Review against criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: