Talk:Crayon Shin-chan/GA1

The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Link20XX (talk · contribs) 03:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * So upon looking over this article, I am afraid I have to quick fail. Here is why:


 * 1) There is a plethora of unsourced statements. For one, almost all the information on the international releases is completely unsourced. Not to mention the films section has no sources and the video games section also needs more sources and reception has a citation needed tag.
 * 2) The lead is poor; for one the first paragraph is short and lead citations should be avoided as an article develops per WP:LEADCITE.
 * 3) The reception section has zero critical reviews. This is simply unacceptable. While I understand finding reviews for older manga and anime can be hard, there are already plenty in the further reading section.
 * Sorry but in its current state, this is no where near a GA. For awhile this was tagged with additional citations needed, and I certainly agree that tag is valid. Link20XX (talk) 03:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, thank you for the review. I'll try to improve the article. Shinnosuke 15, 07:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC)