Talk:Creationism and intelligent design

Can we be neutral as to whether ID is Creationism? That is, can we describe the opposing viewpoints expressed on whether ID can be considered as an independent idea and evaluated on its own merits, or whether it can only be construed as a pro-Creation argument and evaluated on that basis?

I'm thinking of text like this:
 * Opponents and some proponents consider ID to be a form of Creationism (or an argument for Creationism)
 * Some supporters of ID consider want the idea to evaluated on its own merits.

Is this okay? --Uncle Ed (talk) 13:28, 14 February 2009 (UTC)


 * No. Inaccurate is never neutral. KillerChihuahua?!? 19:54, 15 February 2009 (UTC)