Talk:Creative education

Untitled
Peer Review:
 * Typo? to problem solve with (when) faced with a challenge...
 * Are you going to expand on the "incubation" term in the research section? I think since you discuss it in the Different Methods section, it would not be needed. However, I feel there is confusion when mentioning it so briefly without much introduction in the Research section's first sentence.
 * Typo? Under USA: strict cirriculum if not just...
 * I feel phrasing if a little off: Statistic that may show a decline in education fostersing creativity (is the decline?) of start-ups.[19]
 * Are you using the "Overview" as the lead section? If so, would you consider placing the "relating concepts" underneath the "creative education"?
 * When researching, did you find anything that suggested that "traditional" education does offer development in the areas suggested by the other creative education methods?
 * In Research it also seems that placing the last two sentences that you have separated, "In relevance to education" before everything else might make things more clear as well.

--studentlearning 18:18, 21 March 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bazante.m (talk • contribs)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kempf.k.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review 2:
What does the article (or section) do well?

This is such an important subject and I really liked the way you presented the content from both a research and application point of view. You did a really nice job of presenting the information a clear and concise manner.

What changes would you suggest overall?
 * I would suggest switching the order of the first two sections. I think it is more important to first know what of creative education is before knowing what are the related concepts and what it is not.
 * Edit first line of creative education overview section: problem solve when faced with a challenge
 * Format research headline to match different methods
 * Maybe say a little more about why teachers need flexibility as well for this to work
 * Can you explain a little more about what each method is? specifically the incubation model. be explicit.
 * Try to define acronyms before using them where possible/appropriate
 * In the UK section i would say focused on instead of surrounding around
 * How does northern ireland use creativity?
 * If all of those advocates are from the US I might just mention that *in the heading since you just got through talking about how other countries do it and this is such a global subject.

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution?

Try to condense where you can and expand where you think there are gaps in comprehensiveness. I think you cover so much great content here but because of how wide it is, there are some areas that could use more explanation.

--Killeenkr (talk) 00:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review 3:
The article on “Creative Education” presents a relatively meager definition of the term “creative education”. In order to affiliate the reader with the concept, the writer should elaborate more on examples and real life applications of creative education. Moreover, any case studies pertaining to the topic can render credibility and generalization to the article. In addition to this, the writer must give examples and explanations for divergent and convergent thinking, while mentioning different methods, in order to make his point more clear. The article on “Creative Education” presents a relatively meager definition of the term “creative education”. There are a few concerns that the writer should take care of:
 * In order to affiliate the reader with the concept, the writer should elaborate more on examples and real life applications of creative education.
 * I would suggest including any case studies pertaining to the topic can render credibility and generalization to the article.
 * In addition to this, the writer must give examples and explanations for divergent and convergent thinking, while mentioning different methods, in order to make his point more clear.
 * His definition of Creative Problem Solving seems vague as he mentions that “The CPS method is a more explicit form of cultivating creativity and uses divergent and convergent thinking skills”. The writer should elaborate more and must give examples to make the concept clear.
 * The writer can add the practical creative education initiatives taken in Australia to make his point more convincing.
 * I feel that the introduction to creative education can be extended a bit more in order to give a detailed perspective on the concept.

Kamal.a (talk) 07:41, 22 March 2017 (UTC)