Talk:Creativity techniques

Surname links are usually bad
Who are Osborn and Miles? Certainly not disambiguation pages. TimBentley (talk) 04:25, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

External link cleanup
After going through all the links, I was tempted to remove them all. I left a half dozen, but am not really pleased with them either. Let's try to hold to WP:EL and WP:SPAM, please. --Ronz 15:53, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

If anyone's watching
I'm working on the creativity page, and I'll be doing my best to make this page more useful for that page (it's long) by moving material here. If anyone has stuff to offer, it would be great. At the moment the biggest issue seems to be that this page is not sourced, and has various musings rather more than material based in the literature.VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Creativity techniques. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080706010359/http://www.cognos.com/newsletter/decisions/st_070307_01.html to http://www.cognos.com/newsletter/decisions/st_070307_01.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:54, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Merge proposal, March 2017
I propose that Group creativity techniques, created by User:Silver Master today, be merged into Creativity techniques. Many of the techniques listed or described in Creativity techniques are already techniques that are used by groups, so it seems unwarranted to have separate articles for "individual" and "group" creativity techniques. Biogeographist (talk) 18:30, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you can understand enough of Group creativity techniques to merge it into this article, I would suggest that you be WP:Bold and go ahead and do it. If there's not enough there to merge, it can simply be redirected here. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:59, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I will do it 30 days after the merge proposal, per WP:Merging. Biogeographist (talk) 11:34, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Suit yourself, but that it what WP:BOLD is for. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * On second thought, I agree that enough time has already passed to merge now. Biogeographist (talk) 17:37, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

✅ — No objections after a couple of weeks. Biogeographist (talk) 17:37, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Removal proposal, September 2018
The Web 2.0 section seems very out-of-place in this article as it doesn't describe a technique, but describes collaborative aspects of Web 2.0 in vague terms without citation. Hadley12656 (talk) 21:05, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Agree. The single source it had was a wikispace that's now gone. I boldly deleted the whole section. OsFish (talk) 02:17, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

India Education Program course assignment
This article was the subject of an educational assignment supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program.

The above message was substituted from by PrimeBOT (talk) on 20:03, 1 February 2023 (UTC)