Talk:CredibleMeds

Opinions of subject matter experts sought
If this draft were moved to article space, would it probably survive a listing at Articles for deletion? Issues that do not affect the likelihood of success at AfD (e.g., halo effects like formatting) should not be considered when making this fundamental calculation, although I'm sure the author would appreciate any advice or help improving it. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:54, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I think this should make it. As a cardiologist with an interest in inherited conditions who regularly uses and directs patients to CredibleMeds, this is a really valuable resource.  This is reflected in the adequate secondary coverage. The site has been mentioned obliquely in several of the QT articles e.g. Long QT syndrome, Andersen-Tawil syndrome and deserves an article. As it stands it is only a stub but I think it should stay. I've edited it slightly for style. PeaBrainC (talk) 18:45, 24 June 2019 (UTC)