Talk:Creek whaler/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:55, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Here we are again - I'll jot notes below: Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:55, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I think I'd delink family in the lead as it is a sea of bluelinks....
 * I've delinked "Carcharhinidae".
 * That's fine - just needed to de-blue it a bit. Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:19, 10 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I generally italicise "Least Concern" as  Manual of Style/Text formatting - see emphasis - word-as-word.
 * I'm reticent to do this, as it's not italicized on the IUCN page (or in the IUCN status template). In any case, I think the capitalization adds enough emphasis.
 * Okay - not a deal-breaker. Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:19, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Let me know of further issues. -- Yzx (talk) 19:21, 10 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Nothing else is jumping out at me. I went through and found surprisingly little to tweak, so I guess that's a pass...


 * Thanks for the review. -- Yzx (talk) 21:57, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Looks good Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:19, 10 December 2011 (UTC)