Talk:Crew Dragon C205

Proposed merge of Crew Dragon with Crew Dragon C205
None of the cited sources at Crew Dragon C205 mention "C205" in their text, leading me to believe that this article should be merged to another Crew Dragon article. Crew Dragon In-Flight Abort Test may also be a valid target. signed,Rosguill talk 20:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Don't merge I just added two references where the serial number is mentioned to be C205 for the capsule which completed the in flight abort test (IFA). And with the only reasoning for a merge that there was no specific mention from the sources I do not think that the article should be merged.  Terasail &#91;✉&#93; 20:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Even with those sources, I'm not sure that the subject meets WP:GNG. signed,Rosguill talk 20:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I guess it is not as notable as other space capsules and articles however, I still think it meets GNG. Other user responses will decide this one as I can definitely see your perspective aswell. Terasail &#91;✉&#93; 20:47, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - there's enough here to pass GNG for the individual capsule's notability. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:07, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Certainly don't merge it with Crew Dragon which is a redirect to SpaceX Dragon 2. Neither the redirect nor the redirect target are the right place to discuss individual vehicles. The alternative to "keep" would be "delete". --mfb (talk) 01:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC)