Talk:Crewkerne/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 19:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:02, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * There are rather a large number of stray sentences and short paragraphs. Can these be consolidated?
 * Several short paragraphs combined
 * A company Solocrest Limited, founded in 1991, changed its name to Ariel Ltd in 2001.  Rather clumsy. can this be rephrased to read better?
 * Reworded
 * I made a number of copy-edits and minor fixes.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Referencing is good, all those that I could access check out.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Good use of images (Geograph is an article illustrator's best friend!)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, just a few points, on hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review (and edits). Hopefully the issues identified have been addressed?&mdash; Rod talk 20:44, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Good, excellent work. I am happy to pass this as a good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, just a few points, on hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review (and edits). Hopefully the issues identified have been addressed?&mdash; Rod talk 20:44, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Good, excellent work. I am happy to pass this as a good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)