Talk:Cricket at the 1900 Summer Olympics/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sarastro1 (talk) 08:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Excellent article, very interesting and well written. I'm aware that you are probably busy so I've tweaked any minor issues I saw rather than listing them here. Feel free to revert anything that doesn't work.


 * "Neither team was nationally selected": I quite like this phrase (lead and main body), but is there any way to tweak it to include that they were not representative as well? If not, no problem.
 * "The British side was a touring club team": A little clumsy; why not simply "touring club" or "touring team".
 * Not a big deal, but "retrospectively formally recognised " is a little cumbersome, but I realise all the words are sort of necessary. I tweaked the main body but not sure about lead.
 * Very minor, but cricinfo links are showing as redirects since it changed to "espncricinfo.com".
 * Any images available for any of this, it would really help if at all possible.
 * All refs check out.

I'll not even bother putting this on hold. If you are too busy to do much, I'll put it on hold in a couple of days, but there's very little to do. Hopefully a future FAC? I imagine it might go down quite well. It's almost a shame the article isn't "Cricket at the Olympics"! --Sarastro1 (talk) 08:49, 23 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review: I've tweaked the language where you've mentioned it (I took retrospectively out completely, it seemed redundant). Also fixed the cricinfo links.  Harrias  talk 16:17, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All good, passing now. --Sarastro1 (talk) 23:40, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I have added a photo of the venue. extra 999  ( talk ) 03:46, 21 July 2012 (UTC)