Talk:Criminal (Ra.One song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Σ (talk · contribs) 06:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

→ Σ  τ  c. 06:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

My immediate comment is that the article's length is a little short. There is no specific length requirement for GA, but the article must be broad in its coverage.


 * Lead
 * Looks OK, although it needs a copyedit and rectification of some MOS problems. See WP:MOSMUSIC.


 * Release
 * Looks fine, but needs a bit of expansion, copyedit, and MOS compliance.


 * Critical reception
 * It reads like an advertisement and needs less direct copy/pastes, more prose.


 * See also
 * Looks good.


 * References
 * Some of them need cleaning up with more information; publisher, consistent date formats, and the like.


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * In general, the article needs copyediting, less direct quotes, and compliance with WP:MOSMUSIC.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Is there any available information? About the development of the song, for instance?
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Critical reception section reads like a advertisement.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Non-free use rationales need immediate attention, and the captions are.... vague, at most.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I'm afraid I have to fail this nomination. The article is a good start, but still has many issues that inhibit it from reaching GA. I suggest that you try to bring it up to B-class and have a peer review before another GA nomination, which I hope does succeed. Good luck. → Σ  τ  c . 07:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I'm afraid I have to fail this nomination. The article is a good start, but still has many issues that inhibit it from reaching GA. I suggest that you try to bring it up to B-class and have a peer review before another GA nomination, which I hope does succeed. Good luck. → Σ  τ  c . 07:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)