Talk:Criminal damage in English law/Archive 1

Do not re-direct
Do not re-direct this page to Property Damage which is US specific and does nor re-late to Criminal Damage in the UK.--Pandaplodder 18:04, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Survey
WP:Good article usage is a survey of the language and style of Wikipedia editors in articles being reviewed for Good article nomination. It will help make the experience of writing Good Articles as non-threatening and satisfying as possible if all the participating editors would take a moment to answer a few questions for us, in this section please. The survey will end on April 30.


 * Would you like any additional feedback on the writing style in this article?


 * If you write a lot outside of Wikipedia, what kind of writing do you do?


 * Is your writing style influenced by any particular WikiProject or other group on Wikipedia?

At any point during this review, let us know if we recommend any edits, including markup, punctuation and language, that you feel don't fit with your writing style. Thanks for your time. - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 03:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Merger of Malicious Damage Act 1861
This is the first proposal of a number intended to collect the whole corpus of UK law relating to property damage in one place. I was intending to expand this article to mention briefly the common law and the MDA1861, but since the material already exists, it makes sense to me to merge, with appropriate redirects. In the particular case of the MDA1861, This article already has an A-class rating and it is proposed to nominate for GA as soon as it is ready. Your comments would be welcome. -- Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 22:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * most of it is repealed and therefore only of historical interest
 * the parts of it remaining are rarely prosecuted as such, because the CDA1971 also covers them.
 * Since nobody objected, I have done this merge. -- Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 01:16, 3 March 2008 (UTC)