Talk:Criminal orders (Nazi Germany)

Requested move 4 August 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Page not moved. There was no consensus for the move. (closed by non-admin page mover) --  Dane  talk  17:12, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Criminal orders → Criminal orders (Nazi Germany) – See below (t &#183; c)  buidhe  07:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:23, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Judging from search results, the primary topic for this term is protection orders (redirect -> injunction), aka criminal protection orders or criminal orders for short. "Criminal order" is also an alternative term for unlawful order in the generic sense, in terms of war crimes. However, judging from Google Scholar results, this meaning is much less prominent than the first. Therefore, I suggest a primary redirect to injunction, with hatnotes as appropriate. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  07:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Oppose redirect to injunction, which does not mention the term. Protection orders and protection order point to two different articles... Srnec (talk) 20:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC) I do not object to a move per se, but a dab page seems more useful right now than the proposed redirect. Srnec (talk) 22:38, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose: there's no other article with this name at the moment, so a disambig in the article name is not needed. If such articles develop, then creating a disambig page would make more sense than a straight move. I don't see a need for this just yet. --K.e.coffman (talk) 13:04, 14 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.