Talk:Crinum pedunculatum

Relation between text and reference
This page (before I change it to its current url) was given as reference for "The differences between C. asiaticum and C. pedunculatum are subtle. The latter tends to be somewhat smaller, but has broader petals, giving it a less fragile appearance."

but I cannot[word changed by Peter coxhead (talk) 12:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)] see how the content in the page is related to the referenced text. If there is no relation I think that the url should be moved to "external links" and another reference should be given for that text if necessary.--Canyq (talk) 03:56, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * We can use that ref to reference other information in the article and leave a tag for that setennce. I'll do it now. Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I think that the page should really be merged with Crinum asiaticum as most of the reliable sources now treat it as merely a variety of this. Peter coxhead (talk) 12:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)