Talk:Crisaborole

Peer Review (Bialic)
Fantastic amount of research and dedication. This is extremely well researched. I would say add more to side effects because it seemed a little empty, at least compared to the remained of the article. You definitely don’t fall short on the mechanism of actions that's for sure. Since you were reviewed in class there isn't much left for me to comment upon. You fixed the boxes, and that was really my only edit anyways. As someone ALSO with psoriasis I was super interested to read about this. It was professional and not TOO scientific. Great job, you should submit this to be an article!! Hbialic (talk) 21:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

comments
the clinical trial section was WP:OR. we need a recent (ideally high quality) review article that discusses these things; please do not ever source content about health or safety from a press release. A pubmed search for reviews (see here finds 2 sources: is already used; is from 2009 but good quality is from 2014; not great quality but probably OK - most of the article should be sourced from this Jytdog (talk) 12:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

de-orphaning
added wikilinks to Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor and List of phosphodiesterase inhibitors and PDE4B Jytdog (talk) 12:49, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

PDE4B
PDE4B apparently needs to be updated based on what this compound does - that article is all about psych effects. Jytdog (talk) 12:51, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Eucrisa
If a search in Wikipedia is performed on Eucrisa, it does not bring up this page on Crisaborole. I would add the indexing term "Eucrisa" but am uncertain for the standard on how to do that even after looking at several other Wikipedia entries for drugs. I suggest whomever is monitoring this page add indexing for Eucrisa.
 * ✅. I created a redirect from Eucrisa to crisaborole.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)