Talk:Crisis Core: Final Fantasy VII/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Numbermaniac (talk · contribs) 08:27, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

I have decided to review this article for GA status. On a first glance, I really quite like the article. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 08:27, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria This looks great.
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * The part that states the device had two million sales needs a reference.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * A lot of references, but that one I have already mentioned will need a reference if this is to pass. Also, there are 6 dead links, but as they are not Bare URLs, they are still considered "verifiable".
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * A great article overall, just the one problem I have already stated and this article shall be passed :) -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 08:48, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! I will get on that last bit of correction very soon. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:44, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Never mind, it was fixed here. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 00:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅! -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 03:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * A great article overall, just the one problem I have already stated and this article shall be passed :) -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 08:48, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! I will get on that last bit of correction very soon. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:44, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Never mind, it was fixed here. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 00:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅! -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 03:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Never mind, it was fixed here. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 00:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅! -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 03:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)