Talk:Critical embankment velocity

Engineering infobox at the bottom
Hello, the engineering infobox at the bottom of the article is important for the article per se? Because it is so general. Great job for the rest. Fabio.quaglieri (talk) 12:53, 1 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your review! Yes, the infobox is a little bit general. But, I cannot find a specialized one. It may be improved in the following. Duomo Feng (talk) 13:42, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Reviewer 1
Hi Doumo,

The article is well-organized. Good work! WENQIAOJIAO (talk) 13:22, 1 July 2022 (UTC) --WENQIAOJIAO (talk) 13:23, 1 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you bro! Best. Duomo Feng (talk) 13:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Observations and suggestions for improvements
The following observations and suggestions for improvements were collected, following expert review of the article within the Science, Technology, Society and Wikipedia course at the Politecnico di Milano, in June 2022.

Unfortunatly I'm not an expert in this specific topic so I can't evaluate the scientific quality of the paper in a complete way (especially the last part of the paper).

My general comments are:
 * organisation of the paper is very good;
 * introduction to the problem is well explained;
 * figures could be better commented and cited (the first image is not representative of the phenomenon in my opinion or it could better described);
 * the language is not always clear and correct.

--BarettoDiArchitettura (talk) 08:39, 21 July 2022 (UTC)