Talk:Critical thinking

Critical thinking in tutorials
With regards to tutorials in Oxford, Durham, Cambridge and LSE - in particular, it is likely that tutorials in Durham do not function like the author thinks they do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.138.192 (talk) 12:08, 11 September 2015‎ (UTC)


 * please explain to me why there is no criticism of critical thinking article? Derek Di My Mind (talk) 14:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I ment "why there is no criticism of critical thinking in this article" Derek Di My Mind (talk) 14:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I would argue that this is because critical thinking is a thoroughly positive way of approaching and processing concepts. Depending on the line of work, creativity and subjective viewpoints might be helpful, but rationality and logic will most likely be always favorable in others.
 * So criticism would lead to question logical and rational thinking. However if this is not properly executed, someone might draw the wrong conclusions and take wrong further steps. This however would be a flaw in the execution of a "critical thinking process" and not a flaw of the concept itself. 80.136.141.213 (talk) 05:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:45, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Head of Socrates in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).JPG