Talk:Criticism of Adventist Hospitals

I've cut out most of the article as it was basically an editorial against the hospitals in question. I'm fairly confident that this should just be a paragraph in Criticism of the Seventh-day Adventist Church (if that.) We don't even have an Adventist hospital article - having a criticism of... article in these circumstances is ridiculous. If no-one objects I'll do it in a few days.--Cherry blossom tree 23:16, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I've merged to Criticism of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. —Quarl (talk) 2006-07-02 20:16Z 

contradiction
The statement appears contradictory. The fact that one hospital has settled fraud allegations, in no ways appears to be a criticism, but a statement of fact about the hospital willing to settle grievance. That another hospital settled a completely different matter in court pertaining to a completely different grievance, again hasn't anything to do with criticism. Also, the fact that only two hospitals are mentioned out of the thousands of hospitals in the U.S. doesn't appear to justify the statement whatsoever and falls under original research. Ste4k 10:58, 2 July 2006 (UTC)